State v. Davis — Ohio Ct. App., 2026 (courtlistener.com)

Trial court did not err by denying motion for Franks hearing because information that was omitted from the search-warrant affidavit was not necessary to the finding of probable cause. Trial court did not err by denying motion to suppress because the search-warrant affidavit did not contain undisclosed inferences that usurped the magistrate's inference-drawing authority. [Cite as State v. Davis, 2026-Ohio-3824.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 25AP-441 v. : (C.P.C. No. 23CR-2264) Da’Quan M. Davis, :