Hunter-Bey v. Cleveland Law Dept. — Ohio Ct. App., 2026 (courtlistener.com)

Pro se: App.R. 16; App.R. 12; R.C. 149.43; public-records request; motion to dismiss; Civ.R. 12(B)(6); de novo review; pending motions. Judgment affirmed. There is no requirement that a trial court rule on all pretrial motions before granting a motion to dismiss pursuant to Civ.R. 12(B)(6). Dismissal of appellant's mandamus action was proper because appellant failed to comply with the procedures set forth in R.C. 149.43(C)(1). [Cite as Hunter-Bey v. Cleveland Law Dept., 2026-Ohio-1869.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA ISAIAH HUNTER-BEY, : Petitioner-Appellant, : No. 115696 v. : CITY OF CLEVELAND LAW DEPARTMENT,